Russian President Vladimir Putin has vowed to destroy the New World Order for degrading family values and weaponizing sex on global society.Putin effectively killed the ideology of the New World Order saying it was his duty to uphold family values.Putin: “As head of state today, I believe it’s my duty to uphold traditional values and family values".Putin also recently accused the Western Elites of attempting to normalize pedophilia as another method of abandoning family values claiming that the are creating a culture of "excessive, exaggerated political correctness" that will destroy western civilization if it's not dealt with.
Lena Mozya reports: So much for Sigmund Freud, Wilhelm Reich, Aleister Crowley, Timothy Leary, Betty Friedan, Gloria Steinem, Eve Ensler, Rosa Luxemburg, Andrea Bronfman, and other theoreticians who saw family values as a threat to civilization. Notice that Putin’s proposition has two parts: 1) no one has the right to attack family values and 2) no one has the right to persecute people because of their sexual orientation.This is actually a modus vivendi, and it is perfectly congruent with practical reason. The sad thing is that we had a plethora of theoreticians at the dawn of the twentieth century who hated practical reason. They did not want to subordinate their desire or appetite to the moral order, therefore they came up with a number of rationalizations to justify their misbehavior.More importantly, those theoreticians desperately tried to impose their essentially wicked worldview upon the majority of people around the world. Those theoreticians deliberately ignored the fact that there is a moral, philosophical, scientific, ethical, and esthetic order.One particular theoretician who metaphysically ignored that order at the dawn of the French Revolution was Marquis de Sade, a revolutionary philosopher and decadent writer who turned sexuality upside down.
In Philosophy in the Bedroom, Sade was essentially setting the stage for people like Freud and Wilhelm Reich when he stated:“Fuck, Eugenie, fuck away, my dear angel! Your body belongs to you, and to you alone. You are the only person in the world who has the right to enjoy your body and to let anyone you wish enjoy it.”[10]“To fuck women in the rear is but the first part of buggery [sodomy]; tis with men Nature wishes men to practice this oddity, and it is specially for men she has given us an inclination….
“We are born to fuck, because by fucking we obey and fulfill Nature’s ordinations, and because all man-made laws which would contravene Nature’s are made for naught but our contempt.”[1]Here and elsewhere, Sade was following the logical outworking of the Enlightenment philosophy, which, like feminism, promised freedom on the surface but delivered moral and intellectual bondage. If morality does not exist, as Darwin and others would later postulate, who is to say that Sade is wrong? If man is just a machine and nothing more, as Enlightenment writers like d’Holbach and Helvitius argued, who is to say that rape is wrong, or that sexually abusing or torturing children are repugnant? Sade again declared:“What is man? And what difference is there between him and other plants, between him and all the other animals of the world? None, obviously.”Since there is no real difference between man and plants—or even worms for that matter—Sade proceeded to cross the ideological Rubicon, never to return to sanity. “Women are nothing but machines designed for voluptuousness,” he said. As a metaphysical principle, “Voluptuaries of all ages and sexes” must “listen solely” to the “delicious passions” which guide them, and that “their source is the only one that will lead to happiness.”[2]
Post a Comment